Keir Starmer’s Austerity Betrayal: Labour’s Lost Soul?
When Labour stormed to victory in July 2024, Keir Starmer stood at the helm of a party promising a seismic shift: relief from years of Conservative mismanagement, a renewed commitment to social justice, and a lifeline for Britain’s most vulnerable. Eight months later, that vision is fraying. The economy remains shaky, progressive policies clash with harsh cuts, and a creeping fiscal conservatism has left Labour’s base reeling. Is this government a pragmatic response to inherited chaos, or a betrayal of the principles that once defined Labour? This article delves into the economic hand Starmer was dealt, the mixed signals of his early tenure, the growing sense of abandonment among voters, and the political tightrope he now walks. What emerges is a paradox: a Labour Party straining to prove its fiscal credentials at the expense of its soul, and perhaps, its future.
From Tory-Lite to Full-Blown Austerity
Labour stepped into a Britain battered by economic stagnation. Household incomes have languished for over a decade, inflation has eroded purchasing power, and public services - gutted by years of Tory underfunding - teeter on the brink. Starmer inherited a daunting mess: a £22 billion deficit “black hole” identified by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in July 2024, alongside an NHS waiting list of 7.6 million patients (HM Treasury, 2024; NHS England, 2024). It’s a brutal starting point, one that would challenge any new administration.
Starmer and Reeves have responded with a rigid fiscal orthodoxy that feels more Westminster seminar than Labour rally. The deficit, they argue, must be tamed; a stance rooted in Labour’s manifesto pledge to balance day-to-day spending (Labour Party, 2024). Tories have long branded Labour as reckless spenders, a barb that stung during the Corbyn era. Now, Starmer’s overcorrection projects economic discipline to neutralise those attacks. But it’s come at a cost.
Welfare is the newest flashpoint. Reports from March 2025 reveal plans to drive through cuts that could hit the UK’s most severely disabled, tightening eligibility for benefits like Personal Independence Payment (PIP) (The Guardian, 2025). Reeves has framed this as a necessary curb on rising costs, a line echoing George Osborne’s austerity rhetoric. Labour MPs, especially in marginal seats, are bracing for backlash (The Guardian, 2025.) Party unity, fragile after years of infighting, is under strain. While these cuts don’t yet match the breadth of Cameron’s bedroom tax or Osborne’s universal credit rollouts, for a party forged to defend the vulnerable, this shift feels like a betrayal of its roots.
Mixed Signals: Progress and Peril
Labour hasn’t sat idle. Free breakfast clubs have rolled out in primary schools, a practical move to tackle child poverty and ease family budgets, with the first 750 schools confirmed by March 2025 (Department for Education, 2025). It’s a policy with echoes of Labour’s post-war welfare legacy. The NHS, too, has seen boosts - 40,000 extra appointments weekly funded by £1.3 billion in the October 2024 Budget (HM Treasury, 2024). On paper, these are wins, demonstrating steps toward the social justice Starmer pledged.
Alas, cracks soon become apparent. Breakfast clubs face pressure from broader education cuts, with headteachers warning that tight budgets threaten their viability (The Guardian, 2025). In the NHS, plans to streamline by cutting management structures, dubbed ‘Project Chainsaw’ are underway, raising fears of privatisation despite claims of efficiency (Financial Times, 2025). The optics are grim: progressive promises undermined by fiscal restraint.
Then there’s defence. In February 2025, Labour committed to increase spending on defence to 2.5% GDP from April 2027, rising to 3% in the next parliament. That is the largest increase in spending since the Cold War, a move tied to NATO goals amid global tensions (HM Treasury, 2025). Instability isn’t cheap, but the contrast stings: billions for tanks and jets, yet welfare faces the axe. Money flows to project power abroad, but not to ease the cost-of-living crisis at home. It’s a value statement that jars with Labour’s historical priorities.
The Betrayal of Labour’s Voters
Starmer’s “tough decisions” hit the vulnerable hardest. Beyond looming disability benefit cuts, the two-child benefit cap - a Tory relic - remains, locking families in poverty despite rebellion from seven Labour MPs in July 2024 (BBC, 2024). Winter fuel payments for pensioners were scrapped in August 2024, saving £1.5 billion but sparking fury as energy bills climb (The Guardian, 2024). The cost-of-living crisis grinds on, with food bank use up 37% since 2020 (Trussell Trust, 2024). Labour’s heartland - the working class, parents, disabled people, the elderly - feels abandoned.
This wasn’t the deal. Starmer’s 2024 landslide was a roar against Tory neglect. It was a mandate to rebuild, not replicate. Voters didn’t back Labour for Tory-lite policies; they craved a break from inequality’s churn. Instead, Starmer’s fiscal hawkishness seems a play to win over the cautious voters of Middle England, shedding radicalism to prove Labour can ‘manage the books.’ Commentators argue that Starmer is no radical prime minister for the poor, but a caretaker of Tory legacies (The Guardian, 2025).
And it’s faltering. Starmer’s ratings have slumped, with unions and online forums buzzing with disillusionment. Reform UK voters, craving hard-right policies, stick with Farage’s unfiltered original over Starmer’s pale imitation. The coalition that swept Labour to power is fraying, and goodwill is running thin.
Where Does This Leave Britain?
We were promised an end to Tory rule. Instead, we are watching its logical continuation. We have an austerity-driven government cutting welfare while prioritising military spending, punishing the poor while reinforcing the structures of power. This is not a centre-left government struggling with tough choices; it is a government making calculated ideological decisions that strip social protections from those who need them most. Starmer isn’t the radical leader poor people need because he’s doubling down on policies that echo the Tories’ worst instincts.
Starmer is advancing Conservative policies in a way that even previous Tory leaders might have hesitated to do. If this is what ‘Labour’ is in 2025, what exactly is the point of voting for them? Reform UK is already waiting in the wings, feeding upon voter anger. If Labour continues on this path, the political landscape of Britain could shift in ways that were once unthinkable. When a supposed Labour government begins sounding like the austerity-era Tories, what’s left for the voters Labour was meant to serve?
Starmer would do well to realise that he’s not going to win people over by trying to out-Reform the Reform UK party. He should be a real Labour Prime Minister.
Notes From Plague Island is quickly becoming a full-time venture. We want to grow our output and dedicate more time to writing, but it takes support! If you enjoy our work and can help, please support us on ‘Buy Me a Coffee.’ Every coffee helps, in many ways. Thank-you - we appreciate you!
https://buymeacoffee.com/notesfromplagueisland
References
BBC (2024) ‘Labour suspends seven rebel MPs over two-child benefit cap.’ Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51yqe3p7neo (Accessed 17 March 2025)
Department for Education (2025) ‘Free breakfast clubs in schools programme starts to roll out to primary schools.’ Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/free-breakfast-clubs-in-schools-programme-starts-to-roll-out-to-primary-schools (Accessed 17 March 2025)
The Financial Times (2025) ‘Starmer’s ‘Project Chainsaw’: the NHS, Whitehall, welfare.’ Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/80e252ba-12c0-4688-b907-84c92376e019 (Accessed 17 March 2025)
The Guardian (2024) ‘Winter fuel payment cuts spark pensioner backlash.’ Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2024/aug/29/anger-among-uk-pensioners-cut-winter-fuel-payments-keir-starmer(Accessed 17 March 2025)
The Guardian (2025) ‘Starmer to drive through welfare cuts that could affect UK’s most severely disabled.’ Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/16/starmer-to-drive-through-welfare-cuts-that-could-affect-uks-most-severely-disabled (Accessed 17 March 2025)
The Guardian (2025) ‘Keir Starmer isn’t the radical prime minister poor people need.’ Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/17/keir-starmer-tory-radical-prime-minister-poor-people(Accessed 17 March 2025)
The Guardian (2025) ‘We can’t feed pupils for 60p, say schools in blow to Labour’s breakfast club pledge.’ Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/feb/16/we-cant-feed-pupils-for-60p-say-schools-in-blow-to-labour-breakfast-club-pledge (Accessed 17 March 2025)
GOV.UK (2025) ‘Prime Minister sets out biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War, protecting British people in new era for national security.’ Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/prime-minister-sets-out-biggest-sustained-increase-in-defence-spending-since-the-cold-war-protecting-british-people-in-new-era-for-national-security (Accessed 17 March 2025)
Labour Party (2024) ‘Labour Manifesto 2024.’ Available at: https://labour.org.uk/change/ (Accessed 17 March 2025)
NHS England (2024) ‘NHS Waiting List Statistics, June 2024.’ Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/rtt-waiting-times/ (Accessed 17 March 2025)
Trussell Trust (2024) ‘Food bank usage statistics 2024.’ Available at: https://www.trusselltrust.org/news-and-blog/latest-stats/end-year-stats/ (Acessed 17 March 2025)